Cross-reference Integrity
qpdf reported structural verification issues
53106_PlantandMachinery.pdf · 272 KB
LOW-RISK
Detected type: Generic Financial Document
Finance category: Other Finance
Combined risk
32/100
System confidence: 73%
Easy Summary
Only limited anomalies were detected, mostly moderate or metadata-level. Risk is low but not zero.
Next step: Proceed with caution and optionally perform spot verification on key fields.
Suspected changed fields
These values are not proven originals or edits by themselves, but they sit in the strongest payment/date/amount evidence zones.
Qpdf Check Failed
checking /tmp/piksign_bank_ilefurj2.pdf
PDF Version: 1.7
File is not encrypted
File is not linearized
WARNING: /tmp/piksign_bank_ilefurj2.pdf: file is damaged
WARNING: /tmp/piksign_bank_ilefurj2.pdf: can't find startxref
WARNING: /tmp/piksign_bank_ilefurj2.pdf: Attempting to reconstruct cross-refer
qpdf reported structural problems.
21Passed
5Warnings
1Critical
0Math issues
Creator Metadata
Creator metadata missing
Producer Metadata
Producer metadata missing
Font Inventory
0 unique font(s) detected
Document Title
Advisory field-level risk: field typography differs from nearby text; field character width pattern differs from surrounding text. This is not treated as manipulation evidence unless supported by structural/content checks.
PDF Header Validity
Header present: %PDF-1.7
Cross-reference Integrity
qpdf reported structural verification issues
Trailer Structure
Trailer marker found
EOF Marker Count
1 EOF marker(s) detected
Incremental Update Detection
No incremental updates detected
Object Count Consistency
Byte estimate 35, object estimate 0
Creator Metadata
Creator metadata missing
Producer Metadata
Producer metadata missing
Creator/Producer Relationship
Insufficient data for family comparison
Creation/Modification Timestamp Proximity
Difference: 0.0 minutes
Metadata Completeness
Metadata is present but should be interpreted with context
ExifTool Metadata Cross-check
ExifTool metadata is consistent with qpdf-derived core metadata fields.
Font Inventory
0 unique font(s) detected
Font Mixing Heuristic
Font mixing appears within normal range
Annotations Presence
No annotation markers detected
Form Fields Presence
No form field markers detected
Embedded File Presence
No embedded file markers detected
JavaScript/Action Objects
No JavaScript/action markers detected
White Overlay Rectangle Heuristic
No unusual white overlay pattern detected
Hidden Content / Redaction Recovery Clues
No strong hidden-content/redaction marker combination detected
Image/Object Replacement Clues
No strong replacement clue combination detected
Digital Signature Presence
No digital signature markers detected.
Signature Trust Validation
Document is not signed; trust validation is not applicable.
Signature ByteRange Integrity
No signature markers detected; ByteRange integrity check is not applicable.
Object Stream Irregularities
Object stream markers appear internally consistent
Flattened/Regenerated Structure Heuristic
No strong regeneration marker detected
File Size/Page/Object Density Heuristic
File size 278528 bytes, pages 0, object density 0.00
Passport Acknowledgement Generation Profile
No Passport Seva acknowledgement generation-profile mismatch detected
Source Provenance Markers
No strong source-generation markers detected
Payment/content review: SUSPICIOUS
Basic arithmetic result: VALID. Payment/date/amount fields still look suspicious from visual and statement-field evidence.
Detected details
TitleTOILETS
PeriodTOILETS
Datementions5
Amountmentions34
LikelytravelticketFalse
Basic Structural Markers
Should be: At least one date and one amount for financial docs · Found in file: dates=5, amounts=34
Missing dates or monetary values lowers confidence in structural coherence.
Totals Marker Presence
Should be: Total markers appear in summary-capable docs · Found in file: 2 total marker(s)
Absence of total markers in a financial-looking document is flagged.
Ocr Vs Embedded Text Layer Consistency
Should be: Visible/OCR text should largely align with embedded text layer · Found in file: similarity=0.37, ocrCriticalCoverage=0.54, embeddedTokens=95, ocrTokens=82
OCR-visible content is broadly consistent with the embedded text layer.
Bank document content presence
Should be: bank-related text · Found in file: present
Basic text extraction should find document content.
Field replacement detection
Advisory field-level typography/alignment inconsistencies were observed, but no structural/content manipulation evidence was detected.
Risk score0/100
Assessed fields1
Document Title
Advisory field-level risk: field typography differs from nearby text; field character width pattern differs from surrounding text. This is not treated as manipulation evidence unless supported by structural/content checks.
Bank document module: LIKELY CLEAN
No direct deterministic contradiction was found in the extracted content.
Extracted bank fields
Bank document content presence
Expected: bank-related text · Found: present
Basic text extraction should find document content.